Part of All original research must include a data availability statement. Special Issue Information. Internet Explorer). Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. Corrections, Expressions of Concern and Retractions. Review articles and mini-reviews are most welcome. This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University C. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Conceptualization: [full name], ; Methodology: [full name], ; Formal analysis and investigation: [full name], ; Writing - original draft preparation: [full name, ]; Writing - review and editing: [full name], ; Funding acquisition: [full name], ; Resources: [full name], ; Supervision: [full name],. Please note that retraction means that the article is maintained on the platform, watermarked retracted and the explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article. Dear Colleagues, Biomolecules invites submissions to a Special Issue focused on the chemistry, biology, and medical application of natural peptides and their mimetics in recognition of Nature's remarkable inspiration for gaining new ideas for future medicine. If the manuscript status has been showing "under consideration" for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. . In such cases, material from other sources should be used. MS Office files are also acceptable. Cationic, often amphiphilic, peptides with antimicrobial . Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. Reasons for these changes in authorship should be explained. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final . Science Advances. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? When all the reviewer reports are received, the editors decide to either: If you are invited to revise and resubmit your manuscript, you should follow the instructions provided by the editor in their decision email. Please do not suggest anyone who may have a conflict of interest in reviewing your manuscript, such as former advisors, students, or recent collaborators. Checklists are available for a number of study designs, including: Randomised trials (CONSORT) and Study protocols (SPIRIT), Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and protocols (Prisma-P), Diagnostic/prognostic studies (STARD) and (TRIPOD), Clinical practice guidelines (AGREE) and (RIGHT). Open access publishing page. When preparing your figures, size figures to fit in the column width. [CDATA[> Do not number the appendix figures, "A1, A2, A3, etc." This is especially true concerning images of vulnerable people (e.g. Employment: Recent (while engaged in the research project), present or anticipated employment by any organization that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript. This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. A statement confirming that consent to publish has been received from all participants should appear in the manuscript. This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The editors of the receiving journal will take the reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases they may choose to take advice from additional reviewers. on 21 May, 2021. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. This information will automatically be added to the Record of CrossMark, however it is not added to the manuscript itself. Editorial Board Members are welcome to submit papers to the journal. 6. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Approval of the change during revision is at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. Financial interests: Author A and B declare they have no financial interests. A submission to the journal implies that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any researcher wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Lpga Hall Of Fame Points Current Players, Fletcher Harrison Pierce Car Accident, Camp Pendleton Base Housing, Can Bulldogs Breed Naturally, Times Leader Obituaries Past 30 Days, Articles M